SC_FORK and SC_JOIN

All,

Bart writes:
6.5.7: SC_FORK and SC_JOIN: isn?t the macro based approach a little dated?
Shouldn?t we standardize on an sc_fork_join API with an sc_vector for the
set of processes that are intended to be spawned?

[JA] What does everyone think? Do we want to consider such an enhancement
at this point? Note that sc_process_handle is not derived from sc_object,
so having an sc_vector of process handles is not possible at this point.
Having an sc_vector of process objects might be possible, but would be
unsafe.

John A

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.