From: owner-systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org [mailto:owner-systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org] On Behalf Of john.aynsley@doulos.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 2:22 PM
To: systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org
Subject: TLM issues
Bart writes: 1.2, 1.3 (and other sections): you refer to 'SystemC and TLM-2.0 class libraries' although we also standardize TLM-1.0, so maybe leave out the version (we do the same for SystemC itself anyway)
[JA] I am reluctant to change from "TLM-2.0" to "TLM", because "TLM" is a generic term and this is a specific standard. With SystemC, on the other hand, the term "SystemC" is obviously already specific to SystemC.
Opinions?
I agree with Bart on the remark. Now, regarding the remedy there are multiple solutions.
Maybe "TLM Library" or "SystemC TLM Library" would avoid the confusion with the generic term.
Else, there is always the possibility to replace TLM-2.0 by "TLM-2.0 and TLM-1.0".
Regards,
Jerome
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Jan 11 05:56:53 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 11 2011 - 05:56:55 PST