RE: sc_set_stop_mode

From: Bishnupriya Bhattacharya <bpriya@cadence.com>
Date: Tue Jan 11 2011 - 10:36:04 PST

That sounds reasonable to me, and is also the current OSCI behavior.

-Bishnupriya

From: owner-systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org [mailto:owner-systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org] On Behalf Of john.aynsley@doulos.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 7:16 PM
To: systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org
Subject: sc_set_stop_mode

All,

Hiroshi writes:
1 5.5.3 p.29 2nd paragraph
"The effect if ""sc_set_stop_mode"" is called more than one time from ""before_end_of_elaboration"", ""end_of_elaboration"", and start_of_simulation"" should be described."

[JA] For my two cents, I propose that the rule should be "the last call wins". The value that matters is the value at the start of the initialization phase.

Opinions?

John A

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Jan 11 10:36:32 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 11 2011 - 10:36:33 PST