Progress report and Actions

All,

As of Friday afternoon GMT, the status of the P1666 draft LRM review is:

91 issues raised
18 issues still open

Of the 18 open issues, 7 issues are requests for clarifications to the
description of the process control extensions, which I will address early
next week

The other 11 open issues are

* The semantics of immediate notifications in the presence of static
sensitivity raised by David. In my opinion this is an important semantic
issue, and needs to be resolved.

* TLM-2.0 AT timing and the response exclusion rule

* The values of the SC/TLM_IS_PRERELEASE macros: TRUE/FALSE or true/false

* Changing the name of DECLARE_EXTENDED_PHASE to
TLM_DECLARE_EXTENDED_PHASE

* Warnings from sc_start(0) with no activity, and an API to advance
simulation step-by-step

* Should SC_CTHREAD still be forbidden within end_of_elaboration?

* When paused, precisely which actions should cause errors?

* Do we need to change the version of C++ cited in the LRM?

* Is it allowed to reset() a process before it has first been executed?

* What happens when sc_get_current_process_handle() is called from sc_main
during elaboration?

* Review the STARC state chart slide

Please study the threads on the reflector and give your feedback on each
of these open issues as a matter of urgency.

Thanks,

John A

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.