DECLARE_EXTENDED_PHASE

All,

Let's see if we can pick off and close those outstanding issues. First, from Philipp:

"Shouldn't the DECLARE_EXTENDED_PHASE macro be called TLM_DECLARE_EXTENDED_PHASE?  Probably with an backwards-compatible, deprecated macro provided by the implementation."

I propose we do exactly as Philipp suggests:

1. Standardize the macro name TLM_DECLARE_EXTENDED_PHASE
2. List DECLARE_EXTENDED_PHASE in the annex as deprecated
3. The OSCI TLM-2.0 implementation can support both

Opinions?

John A

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.