John,
IMHO, this is the correct document/version to refer to.
The full reference number is
ISO/IEC 14882:2003(E)
according to my copy.
It may be sufficient to refer to the '98 version of C++, I suppose.
But I don't see a benefit from it since all relevant implementations of
C++ support C++'03 well enough.
Greetings from Oldenburg,
Philipp
On 11/01/11 14:36, john.aynsley@doulos.com wrote:
> All,
>
> Bart writes:
> 1.1: should we mention a version of C++ that we’re compatible with?
>
> [JA] Because of the need to be very specific when citing external
> documents, IEEE 1666-2005 cited the C++ programming language ISO/IEC
> 14882:2003. Is this okay, or do we want to refer to some other version
> of C++?
-- Philipp A. Hartmann Hardware/Software Design Methodology Group OFFIS Institute for Information Technology R&D Division Transportation · FuE-Bereich Verkehr Escherweg 2 · 26121 Oldenburg · Germany · http://www.offis.de/ Phone/Fax: +49-441-9722-420/282 · PGP: 0x9161A5C0 · Skype: phi.har -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sat Jan 15 13:25:36 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 15 2011 - 13:25:38 PST