From: owner-systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org [mailto:owner-systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org] On Behalf Of john.aynsley@doulos.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 2:37 PM
To: systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org
Subject: Re: P1666 Ballot resolution discussion - Part 2
All,
The next set of issues arising from the OSCI Proof-of-concept work was a set of clarifications to the wording of the LRM. There are NO changes of intent here. The people involved (Andy, Bishnupriya, Philipp, and myself) were unanimous concerning the proper interpretation of the LRM, but agreed that the existing LRM wording was somewhat ambiguous in each case.
I am not expecting anyone to object to the following clarifications, but comments are always welcome, of course.
Agreed with that as well.
Jerome
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Apr 27 08:51:56 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 27 2011 - 08:51:58 PDT