RE: P1666 Ballot resolution discussion - Part 4

From: john.aynsley@doulos.com [mailto:john.aynsley@doulos.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 6:29 PM
To: Jerome CORNET
Cc: Stuart Swan; systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org
Subject: RE: P1666 Ballot resolution discussion - Part 4

Jerome,

I've double-checked the wording of the IEEE criticism. The specific thing they objected to was the use of the term "Bibliography". They said "
As per IEEE style the Bibliography is reserved for an Informative Annex. It should either be the first or the last Annex and it should " (sic)

We might be able to reinsert the items under "References" if there was a consensus to do so, but I would have to check the rules.

John,

so the problem is only with the term "Bibliography". I don't understand why we should get a consensus to add something that
was already there and consensually agreed with by participants of the wg. To me this is just an editorial problem: just add a section named differently.

Am I missing something?

Jerome

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.