Geoffrey.Coram wrote:
>Kevin Cameron wrote:
>
>
>>I think I might have misunderstood your instantiation mechanism first time round. I assumed you were instantiating modules then applying paramsets, are you actually using paramsets like (overloaded) macro-modules?
>>
>>
>
>
>I think that is more or less what we are doing.
>
>As to why we don't just used macro-modules (perhaps your next question):
>the LRM talks about how a simulator *may choose* to implement modules
>differently from macro-modules. The LRM doesn't say that they have
>to be done without introducing hierarchy (which you mentioned in a
>previous e-mail), and I don't see that analog_statements are
>restricted from macro-modules, as we intend to restrict them from
>paramsets.
>
> And, of course, the overloading is new (though I suppose
>we could add overloading for macromodules).
>
>
Or just overloading of modules and macro-modules in general. That might
be useful if you have versions of a model with optional pins you don't
want floating as well as for setting the parameters. It might also be
more useful to the digital community.
Kev.
>-Geoffrey
>
>
-- Kevin Cameron, CPU Technology, CA 94588, Tel.: (925) 225 4862Received on Mon May 24 11:52:13 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 24 2004 - 11:52:17 PDT