Kevin -
I want language a little stronger than "should," and I feel that
specifying the format makes it a more forceful request of the
simulator vendors, who have not (as far as I know) implemented
anything of this sort in current simulators.
Also, using the __*__ format seems less likely to collide with
user-defined macros/tokens.
-Geoffrey
Kevin Cameron wrote:
>
> I would suggest that you just say the simulator should provide one or
> more unique predefined macros to identify itself, I don't think it
> needs to be any special format, but if the LRM is using __*__ for
> official definitions you might want to exclude those. If vendors have
> already provided such macros then nobody needs to do any extra work.
>
> Kev.
Received on Wed May 26 06:18:58 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 26 2004 - 06:19:00 PDT