Subject: Re: Summary of Four.
From: Kevin Cameron x3251 (dkc@galaxy.nsc.com)
Date: Wed Aug 15 2001 - 15:00:18 PDT
> From owner-verilog-ams@eda.org Wed Aug 15 13:21:03 2001
>
> Hi Verilog-AMS Team,
>
> David Smith And Martin followed the format. So It was easy to combine. It took me a Half day to get Peter and Kevin into this. I used Cadence Excel as the primary source and added the four companies into this and Averaged the ranking.
> I have analyzed the data yet. I could not add Motorola since they did not follow the agreed upon process.
>
> I will try to analyze the final data. We will discuss the topics and start addressing the issues in our next meeting planned for Thursday. Please take a moment and try to examine your data and ensure that I have transcribed the data properly (especially Antrim and Kevin).
>
> We will have our conference call and try to organize the issues based on the feedback so far. Then we will start addressing the highest priority items first, and follow on with other groups of priorities later.
>
> Let me know your feedback. I will be on the line so that everyone can join
> on time.
>
> Best Regards
>
> Vassilios
Actually David and Martin used a slightly different format that I couldn't process automatically
(XLS -> tab seperated text -> perl -> HTML), the others I managed to handle and the results are
on the website. Vassilios's was processed to give the priority list:
http://www.eda.org/verilog-ams/htmlpages/tc-docs/issues/priority.html
(linked from the head of the priority column)
- WWW issue #0941 came out on top, but the National priority for that was 55 and doesn't appear
to be included.
Updates are best sent using the original Cadance Excel format.
Regards,
Kev.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Aug 15 2001 - 15:11:48 PDT