Subject: Re: Proposal for rewriting Section 8.3.2
From: Srikanth Chandrasekaran (schandra@asc.corp.mot.com)
Date: Tue Oct 30 2001 - 16:10:56 PST
Hello Kev and the committee members,
A more relevant issue is 922.
In either case there is no justification for the non-semmetical nature
of net/probe access between continuous and discrete contexts. Note both
issue 13 and 922 are marked as unresolved. It seems that valid issues
and concerns wrt to the completeness and usability of the language are
being ignored in this discussion, therefore I wish to have a OVI
committee meeting to discuss the issue. Vassilios, is there a meeting
scheduled in the coming week?
Regards
Sri & Graham
Kevin Cameron writes:
#
#....
#
#> I have not seen another proposal that
#provides the user with the ability to handle and process x and z states
#within the analog context.
#
#Posted in January:
#
#http://www.eda.org/verilog-ams/htmlpages/tc-docs/issues/0013/index.html
#
#- looks like you didn't read it :-)
#
#
#Later,
#Kev.
#
-- Srikanth Chandrasekaran Global Software Group, EDA SBU Motorola Australia. Phone: +61-8-8168 3592 Fax: x3501 email: schandra@asc.corp.mot.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Oct 30 2001 - 16:12:11 PST