Subject: Re: Proposal for rewriting Section 8.3.2
From: Srikanth Chandrasekaran (schandra@asc.corp.mot.com)
Date: Wed Oct 31 2001 - 15:54:54 PST
Hi Vassilios,
Just a quick note, 9:00am PT in US, would be our time, 3:30AM on Friday
morning. I think this is really a very inconvinient time for us in Australia.
The time difference is, adelaide is 18.5 hrs ahead of california.
So i would request to move the first meeting to Nov. 1st, 3:30pm, Pacific
Time. That would be 10:00am over here and much more convinient. I cannot
schedule it earlier because i am having other meetings scheduled before.
If this is inconvinient I propose Nov 5th, 3:00pm PT for the first meeting.
Again for the second meeting, Nov 8th would be fine, but once again it has
to be in the afternoon (PT) rather than in the morning.
cheers,
Sri
Vassilios.Gerousis@Infineon.com writes:
#
#Hi ALL,
# We do plan to have a Verilog-AMS meeting on November 13 (face to face) at the
#BACKtoFront EDA conference in San Jose Convention Center. The meeting will start at 1:00.
#That leaves two weeks in between.
# So I would like to call a Teleconference Committee Meeting this week and next week.
#In both Telconference Meetings Sri will lead the conference call. Again the time of the conference is 9:00 PT (SAN JOSE TIME).
#
#1- First Meeting is November 1: Sri will lead.
#2- Second Meeting is November 8: Sri will lead.
#3- Third Meeting is planned for the 13 to get the committee face to face with Dennis Brophy.
#
#(1) Dial
#North America: 866-779-0773
# International: 334-309-0262
#
#(2) Enter room number
#Room Number: *3589511* (The star keys must be entered)
#Participants simply dial the "room number" to join the conference.
#
#Best Regards
#
#Vassilios
#
#
#-----Original Message-----
#From: Srikanth Chandrasekaran [mailto:schandra@asc.corp.mot.com]
#Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:11 AM
#To: edaorg@v-ms.com; verilog-ams@eda.org; Vassilios.Gerousis@infineon.com
#Cc: ghelwig@asc.corp.mot.com; ptamhank@asc.corp.mot.com
#Subject: Re: Proposal for rewriting Section 8.3.2
#
#
#Hello Kev and the committee members,
#
#A more relevant issue is 922.
#
#In either case there is no justification for the non-semmetical nature
#of net/probe access between continuous and discrete contexts. Note both
#issue 13 and 922 are marked as unresolved. It seems that valid issues
#and concerns wrt to the completeness and usability of the language are
#being ignored in this discussion, therefore I wish to have a OVI
#committee meeting to discuss the issue. Vassilios, is there a meeting
#scheduled in the coming week?
#
#Regards
#Sri & Graham
#
#Kevin Cameron writes:
##
##....
##
##> I have not seen another proposal that
##provides the user with the ability to handle and process x and z states
##within the analog context.
##
##Posted in January:
##
##http://www.eda.org/verilog-ams/htmlpages/tc-docs/issues/0013/index.html
##
##- looks like you didn't read it :-)
##
##
##Later,
##Kev.
##
#
#--
#Srikanth Chandrasekaran
#Global Software Group, EDA SBU
#Motorola Australia.
#Phone: +61-8-8168 3592 Fax: x3501
#email: schandra@asc.corp.mot.com
#
-- Srikanth Chandrasekaran Global Software Group, EDA SBU Motorola Australia. Phone: +61-8-8168 3592 Fax: x3501 email: schandra@asc.corp.mot.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 15:55:58 PST