arguments for atanh

Subject: arguments for atanh
From: Srikanth Chandrasekaran (schandra@asc.corp.mot.com)
Date: Wed May 15 2002 - 19:38:50 PDT

• Next message: Srikanth Chandrasekaran: "right operand for shift operators"
• Previous message: Kevin.Cameron@nsc.com: "Re: LRM Issue, bad example in need of lots of corrections"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

LRM states that atanh should accept -1 and +1 as valid values. C man page says
that atanh will fail for an absolute value of 1.

cheers,
Sri

--
Srikanth Chandrasekaran
Global Software Group, EDA SBU
Motorola Australia.
Phone: +61-8-8168 3592 Fax: x3501

• Next message: Srikanth Chandrasekaran: "right operand for shift operators"
• Previous message: Kevin.Cameron@nsc.com: "Re: LRM Issue, bad example in need of lots of corrections"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed May 15 2002 - 19:40:29 PDT