Re: VAMS-CM: new LRM draft, DAC meeting

While I agree the paramset functionality is desirable, I still think it
would be more useful as an extension of [macro]modules than as a
seperate syntactic item. Module overloading is useful functionality, and
I feel you should be able to do it with minor extensions to the existing
syntax and elaboration semantics. If a later committee decides to do
module overloading then paramsets (as described) would probably become
redundant syntactic baggage.

At a minimum it should probably be run by the SV committee to see which
they would prefer.

Kev.

Geoffrey.Coram wrote:

>Hi -
>I've just posted a new version of the LRM to the web site,
>http://www.eda.org/verilog-ams/htmlpages/compact.html
>
>It's the complete draft-e LRM, including most of paramsets
>(no examples, and omitting Monte Carlo) and including the
>table_model proposal.
>
>I have requested a "birds-of-a-feather" session for DAC;
>if enough of you are there and sign up, we'll get a room
>assigned for Wednesday afternoon (sometime before the
>DAC party, I'm told). I won't know specifics until I'm
>there, and I won't have e-mail access.
>
>Hope to see some of you there.
>
>-Geoffrey
>
>
>
>
Received on Fri Jun 4 15:06:13 2004