RE: Multi-dimensional arrays?

George,

I apologize for irking you again.  It was not my intent.
In fact when I wrote the sentence you quoted I was not
in an angry mood or shouting it, I was writing it in a
begging "tone of voice" which unfortunately didn't come
across the monitor you were reading it through... :-)

I really don't know the size of this email reflector,
so I may be expecting more than there really is.  And
my intension is certainly not to overload this forum
with "personal" questions either.  I usually post a
question here when I feel the LRM is missing something,
or when it is not clear on something, hoping that I
could get an answer, and/or that the LRM will get fixed.

However, I am not looking for and asking for answers about
simulators.  I am trying to find out what is officially
available in the language so that I can write my models
according to the LRM and not according to implementations
in certain tools.  I need to know what the intent of the
LRM is so I can talk to the tool vendors if necessary.
Where else can I go to find out what the official word
is in the LRM?

Sincerely,

Arpad
=======================================================




-----Original Message-----
From: geoffrey.coram@analog.com [mailto:geoffrey.coram@analog.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 9:53 AM
To: Muranyi, Arpad
Cc: VerilogAMS Reflector
Subject: Re: Multi-dimensional arrays?

I know I'm the one who ticked you off ... 

To be honest, your original message irked me (again)
when it said

> Could someone please
> answer the question?

as though the sole reason for this e-mail list's existence
was to answer your questions, and that people on the list
all know the answer to your question for every simulator in 
existence, and we're not answering you just out of spite.

I wasn't around for the original AMS definition, and I don't
work for any of the simulator vendors; no one on the list
works for all the vendors, so there's simply no one who can
answer your question about what works in every simulator.
It's not that we in the group are "forgetting" the role of
the spec.

...
...
...

So, in summary, I apologize for ticking you off, but please
keep in mind that we're all volunteers here, and we don't
know everything.  The LRM is the spec, and if you think
that it is ambiguous in some way, then by all means, let's
open up a Mantis item and get the committee to work on 
language to clarify it, consistent with how the vendors
have implemented it (to the extent possible).

-Geoffrey