Also see 4.1.1.2, Arithmetic conversion, which says that if either operand is real, the other operand is converted to real, thus 2) and 3) are performed as real division. But you must have read that section, since "integer division" appears twice therein. Are you concerned that the LRM does not specify that "integer division" means truncation as Shalom pointed out? -Geoffrey "Muranyi, Arpad" wrote: > > I am trying to figure out from the v2.2 LRM what the > definition of "integer division" is. This appears > three times in the LRM, but it really doesn't say what > it is. > > Which one of these is/are considered integer division: > > 1) integer / integer > 2) real / integer > 3) integer / real > > Thanks, > > Arpad > =====================================================Received on Wed Dec 14 06:12:12 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 14 2005 - 06:12:40 PST