Sorry guys.. I keep forgetting to switch to my IEEE address.. --- edaorg@v-ms.com wrote: > > From: Jonathan David <jb_david@yahoo.com> > > Hm.. maybe I should indicate a willingness to do > more > than LURK on this list and help with the 2.3 draft, > even though I won't get Scintera to join Acellera. > > ---Sri's last comments were: > I thought they were already present in the language > as > bit wise operators - In chapter 4, Table 4-1 we have > operators such as ~& and ~| which is bitwise and/or > operators. Probably we dont have bitwise xnor. > > Is the same thing being referred here or something > else in digital LRM that we dont have? > > Need to have the full array of operators in digital. > > Some might have some restrictions - real? > ------------------------------------------- > what I discovered (and mentioned to Martin a while > back) was that on the digital side for > reg [1:0] a; > > you get the following truth table for (&a) > a &a |a ^a > 00 0 0 0 > 01 0 1 1 > 10 0 1 1 > 11 1 1 0 > > this is the essence of a reduction operator as > opposed > to a bitwise operator.. > the single (but multibit) argument is reduced to a > single bit.. > > like their bitwise version, in the analog context > the > domain should probably be limited to integers.. > > Jonathan > > > > > > > ----- End Included Message ----- > >Received on Mon Jan 30 10:56:47 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 30 2006 - 10:56:49 PST