Verilog added IP protection in the latest version. Verilog-AMS should adopt this instead of creating its own. David -------------------------- David W. Smith Synopsys Scientist W: 503.547.6467 M: 650.861.9814 -----Original Message----- From: owner-verilog-ams@eda.org <owner-verilog-ams@eda.org> To: Verilog-AMS LRM Committee <verilog-ams@eda.org> Sent: Mon Apr 24 11:22:37 2006 Subject: Question on encryption Hello everyone, Sorry for bringing up such off topic questions all the time, but I would like to find out whether encryption has been considered by the workgroup for Verilog-AMS models. The reason I am asking is because this has been brought up in the recent IBIS Open Forum discussions in connection with modeling bleeding edge high speed buffers behaviorally. Semiconductor vendors feel increasingly uneasy about releasing even behavioral models for such buffers without encryption. In addition we do not like the idea of using the individual and proprietary encryption schemes of EDA vendors, because that would require the model makers to encrypt the same model multiple times for each tool. It seems that there is a strong need for some sort of a tool independent encryption scheme. We thought we should look around what has been done, if anything, before we reinventing the wheel. Thanks, Arpad =============================================================Received on Mon Apr 24 17:46:42 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 24 2006 - 17:46:44 PDT