RE: Regarding support of wreal

In digital simulation, what interests me are states 0, 1, x, z.
I can have different resolution functions like wired-and, etc.
But I don't model the states as 3.14 V.

Shalom


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Cameron [mailto:kevin@sonicsinc.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 10:52 AM
> To: Bresticker, Shalom
> Cc: Sri Chandra; Jonathan David; Verilog-A Reflector; Martin O'Leary
> Subject: Re: Regarding support of wreal
> 
> Bresticker, Shalom wrote:
> 
> >Sure. But that is no longer simulation of digital logic.
> >
> >
> Open-collector/pull-up circuits don't count then?
> 
> [As someone who builds simulators, the only meaningful distinction is
> whether you need a matrix solver or not.]
> 
> Kev.
> 
> >
> >
> >>I don't think it's unreasonable to want to do something like sum
> >>currents at a node using a resolution function. There is a lot of
> analog
> >>
> >>
> >>behavioral modeling you can do without using a solver.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Shalom
> >
> >
> >