Re: analog_expression and analog_operator

In LRM 2.1, the syntax Dave writes was not included, making

I(t,b) <+ C * ddt(V(t,b));

illegal, yet this syntax was actually presented in an example!
I think, but am not sure, that I left this issue alone in LRM 2.2,
since it was not specifically compact-modeling-related and thus
was outside the scope of my mandate.

As Dave notes, the 2.3 LRM cleans up a lot of this.

-Geoffrey



Dave Miller wrote:
> 
> In 2.2 the BNF should include a rule for:
> | analog_expression binary_operator analog_expression
> 
[snip]
> 
> Lemaitre Laurent-r29173 wrote:
> >
[snip]
> >
> > Does-it mean that the following code is not LRM 2.2 valid?
> >   I(p,q)<+mycurrent+white_noise(mynoise);