RE: Question on absdelay

It is.

"may" issue a warning is redundant, since it is optional, and a tool can
issue a warning whenever it wants, unless LRM specifically says that it
shall not issue a warning. But such a statement gives the idea to tool
developers and to users.

"shall" issue a warning is also allowed in LRM. An example is in
1364-2005, 12.3.9.3.

Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-verilog-ams@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-verilog-
> ams@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Geoffrey.Coram
> Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 3:03 PM
> To: Sri Chandra
> Cc: Dave Miller; verilog-AMS LRM Committee
> Subject: Re: Question on absdelay
> 
> I have no objection to the proposed change.
> 
> I recall a number of issues in 1364 where the simulator
> "may" issue a warning or "shall" issue a warning, so
> I believe it is OK to mandate such things in the LRM.
> 
> -Geoffrey
> 
> 
> Sri Chandra wrote:
> >
> > In my understanding that was the consensus - if td and maxdelay are
> > specified in absdelay, then td can vary but cannot be greater than
> > maxdelay value and if it does we will take maxdelay value (with a
> > warning probably).
> >
> > Not sure whether we talk about warnings in the LRM. We refer to
error
> or
> > not, but i need to check that.
> >
> > cheers,
> > Sri