Kevin Cameron wrote: >>>> What do you mean moot? The other form you show is an indirect >>>> assignment, and the LRM presently contains restrictions against >>>> using those along with direct contributions. >>> >>> That restriction only applies within a single analog block. >>> Contributions via OOMR and ports are not restricted that way (the driver >>> of the OOMR is a different block-instance). > > > > At the end of Chapter 5 (5.3.2.2): "It is illegal to indirectly > > assign to an external branch or contribute to an external branch > > which has an indirect branch assignment." > > > That's probably wrong/unnecessary. There is a rewrite rule for > converting indirect assignments to contributions, so no reason for not > mixing them across blocks. Kevin - Your last comment is not helpful at this point. You made an assertion, I cited the rule from the LRM, and then you say, oh, well, the LRM is wrong. No, the LRM defines the standard! The committee reviewed this section last April, and you had nothing to say then. If you have a complete algorithm for converting indirect assignments to contributions that works in all situations and yields the same answers (including tolerances), you are welcome to submit the proposal as a Mantis item. -Geoffrey -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon May 7 03:31:23 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 07 2007 - 03:31:44 PDT