Date: Tue Sep 04 2007 - 05:51:25 PDT
Geoffrey, Technically speaking it is not the attribute that carries over - it is the default discipline that does. The attribute is used just to change that default. As this use of port_discipline is specific to analog primitives, I don't think this is much of an issue. The fact that the attribute instance is in line with the 1364-2005 syntax is more important from a language compatibility issue. Marq To Marq Kole <marq.kole@nxp.com> cc "Geoffrey.Coram" verilog-ams <geoffrey.coram@anal <verilog-ams@eda-stds.org> og.com> Subject Re: port_discipline 04-09-2007 14:40 Classification > Another approach would be to have the port discipline of the first port > automatically apply to any successive ports, if those ports following it > do not have a port_discipline attribute specified. So: In 1364-2005, does the attribute ever "carry over" in this fashion? I suspect not, so I would be disinclined to make the discipline attribute special in this way. -Geoffrey -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
