Re: Why is limexp() an analog operator.

The old spice pnjlim is still a powerful tool!

If you want linear extrapolation, then you can write your own
analog function to do that, and then you can use the function
wherever you want.

In my experience, pnjlim is better.

-Geoffrey


David Miller wrote:
> I am wondering why we treat limexp() as an analog operator? Do we really 
> need to store previous history of limexp() (My understanding is this is 
> what the old SPICE pnjlim does.)
> Can't we just perform a linear extrapolation when the input goes out of 
> bounds?
> Having limexp() as an analog operator imposes lots of restrictions on 
> where it can be used.
> 
> Dave

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.