[Fwd: Re: Updates for section 2, 11, Annex A and Annex B]

From: Sri Chandra <sri.chandra_at_.....>
Date: Thu Dec 06 2007 - 21:37:34 PST
Graham_Helwig-a11558 wrote:
> Sri,
>
> I have attached the tar.gz of all of the versions of the document I 
> worked on. I have just added the syntax documents. Please look at 
> syntax.draft_6.fm and its PDF. I have gone through the document and 
> made some updates (see the change bars). Also I have gone through the 
> current draft of the LRM (draftA) and I have identified a number of 
> problems, mismatches and questions. See below.
>
> Graham
>
> ------------------
>
>
> Below are the mismatches between the syntax in the body of the 
> document and the syntax in Annex A:
>
> - syntax 8-5 mismatch with Annex A.1.8
> - syntax 6-5 mismatch with Annex A.1.9
> - syntax 3-2, parameter_type item in parameter_declaration definition 
> should not be bold.
> - syntax 3-2, string item in parameter_type definition should be bold
> - syntax 3-2, aliasparam, '=' and ';' items in aliasparam_declaration 
> definition should be bold.
> - syntax 6-8, mismatch with Annex A.2.1.2
> - syntax 3-6, mismatch with net_declaration in Annex A.2.1.3
> - syntax 3-7, ground_declaration definition merged into 
> net_declaration definition in Annex A.2.1.3
> - syntax 4-3, mismatch with Annex A.2.6 and Annex A.2.8.
> - syntax 6-1, mismatch with analog construct in Annex A.6.2
> - syntax 5-10 and syntax 5-11 is inconsistent.
> - syntax 4-4, mismatch with Annex A.8.2
> - syntax 4-2, mismatch with Annex A.8.2
>
>
> Other things observed:
> - Section 9 uses Syntax 8-* numbering ... should be Syntax 9-*.
> - Annex A.2.1.2, should wreal being added to the net_type list?
> - Annex A.2.7, AMS changes not referenced in body of document.
> - Syntax 6-10, should the behavioral analog_loop_generate_statement 
> definition be separate from the other structural generate syntax?
> - syntax 5-15, Is there a better way to do this syntax instead of 
> pulling apart a syntax definition?
> - should the analog_function_*_statement definitions be included in 
> the body?
> - section 9.1, strike-through line still in document
> - section 4.1.13 does not refer to the analog concatenation syntax in 
> Annex A.8.1.
> - section 4.5.1 does not use the syntax in Annex A.8.2
> - section 4.4, no use of the syntax defined in Annex A.8.2
> - syntax 2-2, reference to A.6.9 is incorrect
>
>
>


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Dec 6 21:38:00 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 06 2007 - 21:38:14 PST