Graham_Helwig-a11558 wrote: > Sri, > > I have attached the tar.gz of all of the versions of the document I > worked on. I have just added the syntax documents. Please look at > syntax.draft_6.fm and its PDF. I have gone through the document and > made some updates (see the change bars). Also I have gone through the > current draft of the LRM (draftA) and I have identified a number of > problems, mismatches and questions. See below. > > Graham > > ------------------ > > > Below are the mismatches between the syntax in the body of the > document and the syntax in Annex A: > > - syntax 8-5 mismatch with Annex A.1.8 > - syntax 6-5 mismatch with Annex A.1.9 > - syntax 3-2, parameter_type item in parameter_declaration definition > should not be bold. > - syntax 3-2, string item in parameter_type definition should be bold > - syntax 3-2, aliasparam, '=' and ';' items in aliasparam_declaration > definition should be bold. > - syntax 6-8, mismatch with Annex A.2.1.2 > - syntax 3-6, mismatch with net_declaration in Annex A.2.1.3 > - syntax 3-7, ground_declaration definition merged into > net_declaration definition in Annex A.2.1.3 > - syntax 4-3, mismatch with Annex A.2.6 and Annex A.2.8. > - syntax 6-1, mismatch with analog construct in Annex A.6.2 > - syntax 5-10 and syntax 5-11 is inconsistent. > - syntax 4-4, mismatch with Annex A.8.2 > - syntax 4-2, mismatch with Annex A.8.2 > > > Other things observed: > - Section 9 uses Syntax 8-* numbering ... should be Syntax 9-*. > - Annex A.2.1.2, should wreal being added to the net_type list? > - Annex A.2.7, AMS changes not referenced in body of document. > - Syntax 6-10, should the behavioral analog_loop_generate_statement > definition be separate from the other structural generate syntax? > - syntax 5-15, Is there a better way to do this syntax instead of > pulling apart a syntax definition? > - should the analog_function_*_statement definitions be included in > the body? > - section 9.1, strike-through line still in document > - section 4.1.13 does not refer to the analog concatenation syntax in > Annex A.8.1. > - section 4.5.1 does not use the syntax in Annex A.8.2 > - section 4.4, no use of the syntax defined in Annex A.8.2 > - syntax 2-2, reference to A.6.9 is incorrect > > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Dec 6 21:38:00 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 06 2007 - 21:38:14 PST