Draft3 review comments/feedback

Stu,

I just wanted to understand from your end whether you have all the
comments/feedback on draft3. I understand there were minutes, but some 
of the other comments came as just emails. I am not sure how exactly to 
track these to make these updates in draft4 of the LRM. Its not easy to 
skim through the additional emails, unless there is Mantis raised for 
each, but some of them are bit trivial fixes. What do you suggest on how 
to proceed.

I have recorded the following minutes and emails that have been sent 
across that needs to go into draft4 of the LRM.


Minutes of Meetings:
====================
* Meeting minutes - 27th March 2008 (with follow up email from Shalom 
Bresticker on the apostrophe for concatenation). We can correct the 
example as he has specified to be consistent with IEEE P1800.
* Meeting minutes - 3rd April 2008

Additional messages from members:
=================================
Some of the below items were captured in the minutes, but probably not all.
* enable argument missing in BNF for cross - email from Dave miller on 
3rd April (Dave - can you raise a mantis with a small proposal on this 
please)
* Mantis on V(n1,n1): http://www.verilog.org/mantis/view.php?id=2345
* Email from Ken Kundert, 28th March 2008 (Comments on Version 2.3 draft 3)
* Email from Geoffrey Coram, 28th March 2008 (Re: Comments on Version 
2.3 draft 3)
* Email from Xavier Bestel, 28th March 2008 (Re: Comments on Version 2.3 
draft 3)
* Email from Geoffrey Coram, 28th March 2008 (Re: Comments on Version 
2.3 draft 3): regarding _ missing in the BNF
* Email from Geoffrey Coram, 28th March 2008 (Re: Comments on Version 
2.3 draft 3): Starts with comments from Page 152 (169 of PDF)
* Email from Geoffrey Coram, 28th March 2008 (Re: Comments on Version 
2.3 draft 3): talks about `define and `undef

Regards,
Sri
-- 
Srikanth Chandrasekaran
Design Technology (Tools Development)
Freescale Semiconductor Inc.
T:+91-120-439 5000 p:x3824 f: x5199


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.