RE: status mixed-signal subcommittee 21 April, 2008

i've refused to sign up for more email notifications from forums when so many provide Rss feeds .. but kens site doesn't so I don't get prompted to go visit on a regular basis.  google docs wold be fine 2.. but a svn vault would be ideal imho...i could talk 2 kens webmaster if he wants..
jbd

Marq Kole wrote: 
> Hi All,
> To let you know that work in the mixed-signal subcommittee is still
> progressing, here's what I've done over the past two weeks since the
> initial conference call:
> - created a document with a list of issues based on open mantis items, LRM
> 2.2 open items, and a list of items distributed on the email reflector on
> March 20, 2008.
> - converted the design-objectives document webpage on the Verilog-AMS
> standardization website into a Word document, with a few small typo fixes
> as DOD version 5.0.1;
> - extended the design-objectives document version 5.0.1 into a new DOD 6.0
> with updates to align it with IEEE 1364-2005 and IEEE 1800-2005. This is
> very much in its initial stages.
> I would really like to share these documents with you but the communication
> means originally anticipated have at least for the document side of things
> failed to materialize. As an alternative I can try to set up a separate
> area on the Verilog-AMS website but I'm afraid that will run into the same
> kind of problems. Another apporach is to post them on Google docs... I
> would really appreciate some help in this area.
> Ken has set up the restricted area for Verilog-AMS mixed-signal
> subcommittee discussions but so far it seems to be generally undiscovered
> territory. I've tried to kick off some of the discussions that were already
> hidden in the open issues of the Mantis database or the email reflector
> responses. I will shortly revisit these items and try to put forth some
> proposals. For more information on how to access see
> http://www.eda-stds.org/verilog-ams/hm/2546.html.
> Cheers,
> Marq
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.