I wonder if we should hold off on this restriction for LRM 2.3 and enter a mantis item. On the call, we talked about how a zero tolerance would have some meaning related to the simulator's minimum time step, and it seems that this is no longer a simple editorial change. -Geoffrey David Miller wrote: > Hi Paul, > > The typo in 5.10.3.3 I have corrected. > > As for the restriction, we can discuss in call tomorrow. > > Cheers... > Dave > > Paul Floyd wrote: >> Hi all >> >> There is a minor typo in 5.10.3.3 timer function: one occurrence of >> 'timetol' rather than 'time_tol'. >> >> While I'm on the subject of time_tol, I see that for transition, >> time_tol is specified as being non-negative: >> >> "td, rise_time, fall_time, and time_tol are optional, but if specified >> shall be non-negative." >> >> No such restriction is specified for cross, above or timer. Is this an >> oversight, or are zero or negative values allowed for these event >> functions? >> >> Regards >> Paul Floyd > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Jul 24 08:44:48 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jul 24 2008 - 08:45:05 PDT