Re: analysis names

From: Paul Floyd <Paul_Floyd_at_.....>
Date: Fri Jan 16 2009 - 09:07:58 PST
Geoffrey.Coram wrote:

> Hi, Paul -
> I agree that analysis_list needs to be defined; in LRM 2.2,
> initial_step and final_step also took analysis_list as an
> argument, and the syntax was defined (in Syntax 6-11).
> I don't remember why the change was made.
>

Geoffrey,

I go along with this and the rest of your reply.

Regards
Paul Floyd
-- 
Dr Paul Floyd
Mentor Graphics Corporation



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Fri Jan 16 09:08:32 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 16 2009 - 09:08:51 PST