Well the only discipline_identifier that would make sense would be the discrete - dlogic or wire. I don't know enough about digital, but if it doesn't make sense to have a UDP output declared as dlogic or wire then I guess it should be removed. However, the inclusion of the discipline_identifier is the only deviation we made from 1364. Perhaps Graham may have more info on why we made this addition? Regards Dave Surya Pratik Saha wrote: > Hi, > I have seen following rule in Verilog AMS 2.3.1: > *udp_output_declaration ::= > { attribute_instance } output port_identifier > | { attribute_instance } output [ discipline_identifier ] reg > port_identifier [ = constant_expression ] > udp_input_declaration ::= { attribute_instance } input > list_of_port_identifiers > udp_reg_declaration ::= { attribute_instance } reg [ > discipline_identifier ] variable_identifier > * > But I think there is no meaning to add discipline identifier with udp > nets. So LRM needs a correction here. Please let me know if I am wrong > here, otherwise I will file a Mantis. > > -- > Regards > Surya > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is > believed to be clean. -- ============================================== -- It's a beautiful day -- Don't let it get away -- -- David Miller -- Design Technology (Austin) -- Freescale Semiconductor -- Ph : 512 996-7377 Fax: x7755 ============================================== -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Aug 11 06:27:04 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 11 2009 - 06:27:23 PDT