Re: Call time options for AMS meetings

From: Geoffrey.Coram <geoffrey.coram@analog.com>
Date: Fri Oct 08 2010 - 05:20:13 PDT

I would prefer option #2 also.

Marq Kole wrote:
> Hi Sri,
>
> Also for me option #1 is not an option: I would prefer option #2. I do intend to participate in the calls more often than I have done the past few months. Still I think some others have more weight in this matter than I do given my recent absence in the calls.
>
> Cheers,
> Marq
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-verilog-ams@eda.org [mailto:owner-verilog-ams@eda.org] On Behalf Of Sri Chandra
> Sent: Friday 8 October 2010 11:31
> To: Verilog-AMS LRM Committee
> Subject: Call time options for AMS meetings
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Given that most of the countries in Northern hemisphere is in the
> process of changing the clocks (pushing it back by 1hr) and Adelaide is
> pushing it forward by an hour, we probably need look at changing the
> current meeting time.
>
> (in no particular order of preference)
>
> Option1:
> * San Francisco, 6p
> * Austin, 8p
> * Boston, 9p
> * Amsterdam, 3a (next day)
> * Tel Aviv, 4a
> * New Delhi, 7.30a
> * Adelaide, 12.30p
>
> Option2:
> * San Francisco, 11.30a
> * Austin, 1.30p
> * Boston, 2.30p
> * Amsterdam, 8.30p
> * Tel Aviv, 9.30p
> * New Delhi, 1a (next day)
> * Adelaide, 6a
>
> Option3:
> * San Francisco, 6a
> * Austin, 8a
> * Boston, 9a
> * Amsterdam, 3p
> * Tel Aviv, 4p
> * New Delhi, 7.30p
> * Adelaide, 12.30p
>
> Given that Graham has been doing late night calls at 11.30p for last
> several meetings, probably we can look at option 1 & 2. I am fine to do
> option 2, hence put that proposal in the mix.
>
> Regards,
> Sri
>
>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Fri Oct 8 05:20:32 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 08 2010 - 05:20:34 PDT