Hi Achim,
With respect to item #2 already since Verilog-AMS 2.2 there is the $port_connected system function that seems to do exactly as you suggest. Perhaps you could explain what is different in the $connected system function? Also what Cadence system function do you refer to?
Cheers,
Marq
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-verilog-ams@eda.org [mailto:owner-verilog-ams@eda.org] On Behalf Of Achim Bauer
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 3:27 PM
To: Verilog-AMS LRM Committee
Subject: my suggestions for Verilog-AMS extensions
Hi,
in the following I have shortly listed five desirable Verilog-AMS
enhancements, that I missed a lot as a long term user.
( we also planned to discuss about electrical to real-value/aggregate
connections in our next meeting, but unfortunately I did not found
enough time to prepare some initial thoughts for this.
I am sorry, but I think we might discuss this off the cuff too :)
1) EVENT-DRIVEN SOLVER FOR IMPLICIT NON-LINEAR EQUATION SYSTEMS
=
e.g. initially or triggered during ongoing simulation
why?
====
practical spec-like parametrization.
often a typical set of high-level parameters has to be mapped to an
internal representation and the underlying equation system for this can
not be solved explicitly.
example
=======
...
@(initial_step("dc","tran")) begin
// non-linear equation, e.g. system with transcendental functions, to
be solved numerically:
V(x) : V(x) == V(x) + ... ln(f1(x,y),n) ... pow(f2(x,y)) ... ;
V(y) : V(y) == V(y) + ... sin(f3(x,y),n) ... exp(f4(x,y)) ... ;
end
// desirable e.g. according to Scott Morrison
V(op,on) <+ gain * laplace_zp( V(ip,in), , { -x,0, -y,0 } );
...
further suggestions
===================
* also solved for real variables, not only electrical with access
operator
* the syntax for specifying the equation system might be simplified
e.g. like V(x) : 0 == ... instead of V(x) : V(x) == V(x) + ...
* it should be possible to constrain/guide/initialize the solver
e.g. like constraint : x > y/10; instead of + ( ( V(x) >
V(y)/10 )? 0 : 1M );
* implicit (real-value) equations at both the analog and the digital
side
* powerful solver algorithm, e.g. using randomized logarithmic start
vectors
2) SYSTEM FUNCTION $connected(<portname>)
=
returns true if a pin is connected from externally, false if it is
open
executed before elaboration, so it can be used already in parameter
section.
usable within analog and digital code.
why?
====
smart sensitive interfaces for plug&play usage:
library elements often shall be usable as-they-are, e.g. to build up
rapid prototypes or testbenches.
e.g. enable- or supply-pins are not connected in the first instance
or a differential input is just
contacted single-ended or a signal generator is not synchronized by
an external clock but via internal
parametrization.
example
=======
...
initial if ( $connected(en_i) ) enable = en_i; else enable = 1'b0;
...
generate if ( ~ $connected(VSS) ) analog V(VSS,gnd) <+ 0;
endgenerate
...
remarks
=======
* Cadence already offers a similar system function, hence
compatibility should be maintained
3) DYNAMIC ARRAY
=
of scalars, of arrays, of structs...
With VHDL-like attributes, e.g. LEFT, RIGHT, RANGE, LENGTH, LOW,
HIGH ...
why?
====
to measure an unknown number of samples,
e.g. for asserting a rolling average or for extracting statistical
data.
currently: wasting memory, (simulation) performance and the users
time:
a worst case parameter has to be set for the width, but in diverse
reuse/application scenarios the number of samples to be
measured/asserted might vary/scale over many orders of magnitude.
example
=======
...
real y_array [1:+]; real t_array [1:+];
...
if ( sampling ) begin
sample = y_array'RIGHT + 1;
y_array[sample] = Vprobe;
t_array[sample] = $abstime;
end //if
...
samples = y_array'LENGTH;
...
further suggestions
===================
pointers as dynamic array of structs ?
as a powerful extension of 3), to handle/process more complex data
aggregates or structs
4) OOMR READ AND WRITE OF INTEGER AND REAL VALUES
=
why?
====
modify/write/direct/control and observability of real values e.g.
from a remote testbench or correlated modules.
5) BIND
=
SystemVerilog-like bind/generate,
assigns/instantiates e.g. signal generators and measurement units to
particular scopes
of instances, modules, hierarchy levels, port directions,
pin-naming-patterns
or combinations (AND OR NOT...) of the mentionend.
why?
====
enables user-friendly, efficient (automated) application of
Verilog-AMS modules e.g. of
o highZ/floating node checker around interface of a certain instance
o voltage range assertion at all nets with a "_1V2" pattern
o noise injection at a specific scope/node set ...
example
=======
I am using a fictive "oomr"/SV-style binding here,
that names a common (parent) path for all the particular signals that
are then
branching away with their specific hierarchical sub-paths in the
mapping list:
bind <scope_specification> <module_to_be_bound> <instance_name>
(<mapping>);
examples for scope specifications:
tb.dut+3; // the top three hierarchy levels in the instance dut of
the testbench tb
module bp_filter; // cell based
pattern VDD_?V?; // all ports or nets that contain this pattern,
e.g. AVDD_1V2
instances I1 I2 I3 // instance based
ports outputs
...
bind tb.dut+4 AND ports AND NOT pattern *_tri_* highZ I_highZ_
(.sensor(scope), .ctrl(tb.assertions.assert_highZ.trigger),
.result(tb.assertions.assert_highZ.result_));
...
remarks
=======
of course the above example is at best an initial idea,
I have not thought all too much about that topic yet,
there is plenty to brainstorm and discuss for us !!!
Kind regards,
Achim
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Feb 17 06:38:56 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 17 2011 - 06:38:57 PST