RE: Next Verilog-AMS technical committee meeting

Hi, Sri.

For me, that is not a good time.
It conflicts with a meeting of the 1800 Working Group.

Regards,
Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-verilog-ams@eda.org [mailto:owner-verilog-ams@eda.org] On
> Behalf Of Sri Chandra
> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 8:41 AM
> To: Verilog-AMS LRM Committee
> Subject: Next Verilog-AMS technical committee meeting
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Wish you all a very happy new year.
>
> Its been a while since we had a Verilog-AMS technical committee
> meeting.
> I think it is a good time to meet and figure out where we stand in
> terms
> of SV-AMS merger and how we want to move forward in 2012, and what
> commitment we have from various folks involved in the language
> development effort.
>
> I propose to have a call on the 12th of January, 8.00a California time.
> I understand that this will be a bad time for our colleagues in
> Australia, and I apologize for that (Graham - if you are not able to
> join this meeting due to the odd hour, we can provide your thoughts
> through email which can be discussed at the meeting). As part of this
> meeting, we will review our current status, understand the direction in
> which we want to move forward and also most importantly get feedback
> from attendees on how much they are able to commit/contribute to this
> effort in the coming year. We will also discuss call timings, frequency
> to best suit all the key participants who are willing and plan to work
> on the language development effort.
>
> Regards,
> Sri
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.