Marq,
I don't believe it is ambiguous. I interpret it in that there need not be
just one bound on the time step. Instead, all active bounds are applied with the
smallest winning of course. This is certainly what I intended when I wrote it.
-Ken
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:27:59PM +0200, Marq Kole wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> What should happen when the $bound_step system task is called multiple times? The LRM does not say anything about it so this leaves room for ambiguity. There are a couple of options, but I think the most appropriate is that the smallest argument of all activated $bound_step calls takes precedence. This will make sure that the part of the model that requires the smallest maximum time step gets its way. The parts of the model that can do with larger maximum time steps should also be able to live with a smaller time step.
>
> I will make a Mantis item for this issue. If you have alternative views on this matter I would be interested to hear.
>
> Cheers,
> Marq
>
>
> Marq Kole
> Senior Architect AMSRF Simulation
> NXP Semiconductors / Central R&D / Foundation Technology
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Jun 14 12:54:39 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 14 2012 - 12:54:41 PDT