Consider the representation of a directed graph . In addition to the GraphVertex class instances and the GraphEdge class instances contained by the graph, there is the storage required by the adjacency matrix. In this case, the matrix is a matrix of Edges. Therefore, the amount of storage required by an adjacency matrix implementation is
On the other hand, consider the amount of storage required when we represent the same graph using adjacency lists. In addition to the vertices and the edges themselves, there are linked lists. If we use the LinkedList class defined in Section , each such list has a head and tail field. Altogether there are linked lists elements, each of refers to the next element of the list and contains an Edge. Therefore, the total space required is
Notice that the space for the vertices and edges themselves cancels out when we compare Equation with Equation . If we assume that all object references require the same amount of space, we can conclude that adjacency lists use less space than adjacency matrices when
For example, given a 10 node graph, the adjacency lists version uses less space when there are fewer than 40 edges. As a rough rule of thumb, we can say that adjacency lists use less space when the average degree of a node, , satisfies .