Re the action I had, I and Greg did meet face to face
and had a good work over of the parasitics especially WRT what should
and should not be in that section. I will post shortly
(hopefully before the telecon) the now
revised list of terms that resulted and complete the defs of all
of that revised list by our next meeting (though not by today).
The revised list had the result that there are now only a
small group not yet defined per the taxonomy style, and some
minor changes to be made to some of the already completed ones.
- Some of the terms I had proposed we jointly found collapsed into
several of the terms I already had defined (this was about some
terms being about pins in general regardless whether they are
used for inputs or outputs.)
There is a good chance I will be late for the telcon due to my
participation being required at the last minute for a mid-morning
urgent discussion of another matter, but will join as soon as
it is possible.
Regards,
--Steve Grout
SEMATECH
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark S Hahn [mailto:mhahn@cadence.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 1999 2:55 AM
> To: dcwg@eda.org
> Subject: DC-WG: Updated taxonomy
>
>
> I've posted version 0.6 of the taxonomy on the
> DC-WG web site at http://www.eda.org/dcwg
>
>