[$ieee-1850] Issue priority

Hi Erich,

Prioritized Issues list:

issue prio commitee
1. 5 LRM
2. 5 LRM (Something wrong with formulation of issue)
3. 5 LRM
4. 5 LRM (Different from verilog flavour?)
5. 0 (Absolutely not)
6. 5 LRM
7. 3 Ext (Need reformulation, investigation)
8. 5 Ext
9. 5 LRM (Ensure conformity with SVA)
10. 5 LRM --"--
11. 5 LRM --"--
12. 5 LRM --"--
13. 1 LRM
15. 2 LRM (Related to 17)
16. 0
17. 2 LRM (Related to 15)
14. 1 Ext
18. 0
19. 1 Ext
20. 4 Ext (Not minor issue, has relevance for use of formal
                semantics in implementation of abort. Long term)
21. 1 Ext (Messy)
22. 3 Ext (Define sampling semantics in conformity with SVA.)
23. 5 Ext (Variant of 30 and 33)
24. 0
25. 0
26. 5 Ext
27. 5 LRM
28. 0
29. 0 (Tutorial issue)
30. 5 Ext (Variant of 23 and 33)
31. ? Ext
32. ? Ext
33. 5 Ext (Variant of 23 and 30)
34. 3 Ext (Good thing, Long term)
35. 1 Ext (Could be solved in modeling layer?)

Best Regards, Johan M.

On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 08:45:33PM -0700, Erich Marschner wrote:
>
> Members of the IEEE 1850 PSL Working Group,
>
> On Tuesday October 12, at 8am-10am PDT, instead of a regularly
> scheduled working group meeting, we will hold a meeting of the Issues
> subcommittee. The purpose of the meeting will be to come up with a
> proposed prioritization and disposition of the issues, to be presented
> to the working group at the next regularly scheduled working group
> meeting (on October 19). All working group participants are welcome
> to participate in the Issues subcommittee. Note, however, that
> attendance or lack thereof will not affect voting rights, since this
> is not a working group meeting.
>
> In preparation for this meeting, please review the Issues list posted
> on the web page, at the following URL:
>
> http://www.eda.org/ieee-1850/docs/Issues.doc
>
> Make a list reflecting the priorities of each issue as you see them.
> Assign each issue on the list a relative priority between 1 and 5,
> where 1 means lowest priority, and 5 means highest priority. If you
> believe we should not address a given issue at all, give it a priority
> of 0. If you believe a given issue is a simple correction or
> clarification that should go immediately to the LRM subcommittee, then
> identify the issue as an "LRM" issue. Please forward your list to me
> (erichm@cadence.com) by end of the day Monday Oct 11. I will
> accumulate all the responses and present them at the meeting on
> Tuesday.
>
> For consistency, and to make it easier for me to process the data,
> please format your list as follows:
>
> <issue #> <priority> <LRM?>
>
> For example,
>
> 1. 5 2. 3 3. 4 LRM 4. 0 5. 1 etc.
>
> We will use the following phone numbers for the teleconference on
> Tuesday:
>
> US Toll-Free: 877-634-9660 International: 203-566-6784 Passcode:
> 727384
>
> Regards,
>
> Erich
>
>

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Johan Martensson, PhD            Office: +46 31 7451913    	
R&D                              Mobile: +46 703749681
Safelogic AB                     Fax: +46 31 7451939
Arvid Hedvalls Backe 4           johan.martensson@safelogic.se
SE-411 33 Gothenburg, SWEDEN 
PGP key ID A8857A60
www.safelogic.se
------------------------------------------------------------