Re: Comments on IR1001

Peter Ashenden wrote:

>Folks,
>
>I've traced some history behind IR1001. I recall that some of the
>outstanding IRs from VHDL-87 (those < 1000) were brought forward as VHDL-93
>IRs and given numbers 1000+. IR1001 is exactly the same as IR0048, and
>IR0048 is marked as being superceded by IR1001. So we can cross IR0048 off
>our list should we ever get to it!
>
>  
>
The IR with numbers less that 1000 are VHDL-87 IRs. I have actually 
checked that
each of these IRs has either been forwarded with a new IR number 1XXX or 
that
it was closed in the VHDL 93 LRM.

(Before you conclude that I have too much free time on my hands, between 
VHDL-87 and VHDL-93
an exercise was performed to check the VHDL-93 LRM against the IRs. I 
used that work to update
or create some VHDL-93 IRs.)

The bottom line is that I/we have no intention of checking the IRs with 
numbers less than 1000.

Chuck Swart