Chuck, I vote to table 2128. Accellera should have approved D4.0 and we have plenty of higher priority stuff for 1076-2008. I think the analysis is correct WRT block_declarative_part being exactly a concurrent_declarative_part, however, the following appear to be the same: section 2.2 subprogram_declarative_part, section 3.5.2 protected_type_body_declarative_part section 9.2 process_declarative_part If I am right, we may wish to consolidate, but I would place this at a low priority and would not see it being added to 1076-2008. Jim > I know that we're all busy, but we need everyone to vote on > IR 2128 and review IR 2126. In my opinion, IR 2128 is pretty > straightforward. I need feedback on IR 2126, so that I can make > any needed revisions by the next meeting. > > Hopefully after tomorrow Accellera will pass D4.0 over to the IEEE, > and the clock will start ticking for final revisions. This is definitely > the time to move on all your action items. > > Chuck Swart > > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jim Lewis Director of Training mailto:Jim@SynthWorks.com SynthWorks Design Inc. http://www.SynthWorks.com 1-503-590-4787 Expert VHDL Training for Hardware Design and Verification ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Feb 20 17:33:41 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 20 2008 - 17:33:44 PST