I like the revised LRM wording much better than the earlier one. -ajay -----Original Message----- From: owner-isac@eda.org [mailto:owner-isac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Peter Ashenden Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 5:58 AM To: isac@eda.org; vhpi-pilot@eda.org Subject: Revised IR2123 Folks, Based on our email dialog, I have drafted a revision of the analysis and recommendations in IR2123. Please see attached and let me know if any changes are needed. If it's acceptable, I'd like to put it to an ISAC approval vote later in the week. Chuck has indicated that a revision along these lines is acceptable for now, but would like to see a more general statement about the effect of optimizations on VHPI programs. May I suggest that be taken up as a separate issue? Any result changes could be rolled into an amendment, together with other changes that arise after approval of the current revision. Thanks, and cheers, PA -- Dr. Peter J. Ashenden peter@ashenden.com.au Ashenden Designs Pty. Ltd. www.ashenden.com.au PO Box 640 VoIP: sip://0871270078@sip.internode.on.net Stirling, SA 5152 Phone: +61 8 7127 0078 Australia Mobile: +61 414 70 9106 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Apr 9 23:41:24 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 23:41:28 PDT