ISAC: Some comments on LRM review for Monday's meeting

I compared the Bugzilla descriptions in the ballot resolution document 
with the on-line Bugzilla issues
and they agree in substance.

I have started to validate Bugz issues against draft D4.3.
Bugz #208 is very long (43 typos reported) and is hard to verify because 
most
of the fixed typos are not annotated for various (good) reasons.
Anyway, I've compared the two clean versions of D4.2 and D4.3 and the fixes
for #208 are incorporated with one set of exceptions:

D4.3 clean version page 475 line 15: maybe "boolean" should be "Boolean".
However, this is in a comment in a C header file, so I'm not sure.

D4.3 clean version page 487
three references to "denormalize:boolean" two references to 
"check_error:boolean"
These should all be BOOLEAN.

I hope that we will not have to go over #208 again (ever) because its 
very time consuming.

Chuck Swart




-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.