RE: SCE-MI: Is the implementation expected to make internal copy of b inding objects?

From: Bojsen, Per <bojsen@zaiqtech.com>
Date: Wed Mar 17 2004 - 08:25:21 PST

Hi John,

thanks for responding.

> In my opinion the implementation must not be able to assume
> that the information will remain persistent - therefore it should
> copy.

I agree with this. Did I overlook a general requirement to this effect
in the standard?

Thanks,
Per
Received on Wed Mar 17 08:25:38 2004

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Stickley, John: "Re: SCE-MI: Is the implementation expected to make internal copy of b inding objects?"
Previous message: Stickley, John: "Re: Issue IM10: SceMi::BindMessageInPort() NULL binding argument"
Next in thread: Stickley, John: "Re: SCE-MI: Is the implementation expected to make internal copy of b inding objects?"
Reply: Stickley, John: "Re: SCE-MI: Is the implementation expected to make internal copy of b inding objects?"
Maybe reply: Bojsen, Per: "RE: SCE-MI: Is the implementation expected to make internal copy of b inding objects?"
Maybe reply: Bailey, Brian: "RE: SCE-MI: Is the implementation expected to make internal copy of b inding objects?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 17 2004 - 08:25:40 PST