Re: Question about the new clock waveforms (Figure 15 on p. 36/PDF p. 44)

From: Stickley, John <john_stickley@mentorg.com>
Date: Fri Jan 21 2005 - 10:51:22 PST

Per,

You are correct. Apparently when I had added in JIT clocks,
I had neglected to adjust the associated clk enabled signals.

I'm sending a corrected .fm to Brian for insertion into the
document.

Good catch.

-- johnS

Bojsen, Per wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this a question for John, I guess. I'm looking at the new clock
> waveforms in Figure 15 that show an example of the clock control
> semantics. I think there is an error in the clkfast_enabled and
> clkfast_negedge_enabled waveforms. They appear to deassert three
> uclock cycles too early about 2/3rd into the waveforms just before
> the vertical line pointed to by the second `just in time' arrow.
>
> Do you agree or am I missing something?
>
> Thanks,
> Per
>
> --
> Per Bojsen Email: <bojsen@zaiqtech.com>
> Zaiq Technologies, Inc. WWW: http://www.zaiqtech.com
> 78 Dragon Ct. Tel: 781 721 8229
> Woburn, MA 01801 Fax: 781 932 7488
>

-- 
This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged
and/or attorney work product for the sole use of the intended
recipient.  Any review, reliance or distribution by others or
forwarding without express permission        /\
is strictly prohibited. If you are     /\   |  \
not the intended recipient please     |  \ /   |
contact the sender and delete        /    \     \
all copies.                      /\_/  K2  \_    \_
______________________________/\/            \     \
John Stickley                   \             \     \
Principal Engineer               \             \________________
Mentor Graphics - MED             \_
17 E. Cedar Place                   \   john_stickley@mentor.com
Ramsey, NJ  07446                    \     Phone: (201) 818-2585
________________________________________________________________
Received on Fri Jan 21 10:52:58 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 21 2005 - 10:53:01 PST