RE: Cadence Goals Comments - 1

Yet again...
 
Here is a copy of this presentation, without the intermediate markup
from our internal
discussions.
 
Matt


________________________________

	From: Matt Kopser 
	Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 10:36 AM
	To: 'itc@eda.org '
	Subject: Cadence Goals Comments - 1
	
	
	Trouble getting both presentations through the reflector.  Here
is the first one.
	 
	Matt


________________________________

		From: Matt Kopser 
		Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:46 PM
		To: 'itc@eda.org '
		Subject: Cadence Goals Comments
		
		
		All,
		 
		I've attached 2 presentations. (Sorry about the late
submittal of these -- I've been catching
		up after taking some vacation time...)
		 
		At any rate, the first presentation is very short, and
is basically a commentary on the
		means by which the committee moves forward. (In it I
echo Richard's comment about
		focusing in the *interface* in ITC.)
		 
		The other presentation is a modified version of Duaine's
3/24 version of the goals presentation.
		The bulk of the changes are in slide 13 -- plus an
additional slide at the end of the presentation
		summarizing high-level goals of ITC -- with the focus on
interface, mindful of modeling issues.
		 
		And for clarification: Duaine's recent email seems to
indicate that Cadence is not interested
		in working on modeling issues. That's not quite
accurate. Cadence believes that ITC is not
		the appropriate forum to handle modeling issues -- yet
modeling issues are indeed important.
		The first presentation suggests alternate committee(s)
to handle such issues.
		 
		Again, sorry for the late arrival of these documents,
		 
		Matt