RE: udpated mentor proposal

From: Bojsen, Per <bojsen_at_.....>
Date: Thu Jun 02 2005 - 12:41:40 PDT
> Here's a retry on the updated mentor proposal.
> 
> This time it is the whole .pdf

Thanks, John, that really helped to clarify many of the questions I
had about your proposal.

I have a couple of questions:

  1) On Section 5.2, p. 27 you have a bullet that talks about
     multi-threaded HVL environments and restricting calls to
     ServiceLoop() to a single thread.  This restriction is only
     intended to exist when mixing SCE-MI 1.1 and 2.0 models,
     right?

  2) In the time leading up to the 1.1 version of SCE-MI we had
     a few discussions about indirect recursion of ServiceLoop().
     Do you still maintain that that is to be supported even
     when using a strict 1.1 subset of SCE-MI 2.0?

  3) In Section 5.3, on the DPI restrictions, you are proposing
     some restrictions on how DPI functions can call each other
     mutually.  Did your proposal always (implicitly) include
     these restrictions or is that new?  I'm asking because we're
     interested in exploring some of the cases you're proposing to
     not support.

Per

-- 
Per Bojsen                                Email: <bojsen@zaiqtech.com>
Zaiq Technologies, Inc.                   WWW:   http://www.zaiqtech.com
78 Dragon Ct.                             Tel:   781 721 8229
Woburn, MA 01801                          Fax:   781 932 7488
Received on Thu Jun 2 12:40:54 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 02 2005 - 12:41:00 PDT