RE: Meeting minutes 050825

In the minutes:

"Are value returns an extra function call in terms of recursion or is this a
necessary part of the blocking call. General agreement that the return
communications is needed independent of the return value because it releases
the blocking nature of the call"


I don't agree that return communication is needed for a void exported
function call. This is analogous to a SCEMI 1.1 Send() to an InputPort().
Why is return communication needed?

---------------------------------------
---    Russ Vreeland (949)926-6143  ---
---    vreeland@broadcom.com        ---
---    Senior Principal Engineer    ---
---    Broadcom Corporation         ---
---------------------------------------



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-itc@eda.org [mailto:owner-itc@eda.org] On Behalf 
> Of Brian Bailey
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 10:53 AM
> To: itc@eda.org
> Subject: Meeting minutes 050825
> 
> 
>         Please find attached the minutes from today's 
> meeting. Also please be ready with the action item before the 
> next meeting:
>         
>         Action Item: Before the next meeting, everyone should 
> send to the reflector the SOLUTION that they would like to 
> see for the Verilog datatype coercion issue. This should not 
> be in terms of the options or issues, but a definitive 
> statement regarding what each company would like to see as 
> the resolution.
>         
>         We will also consider Duaine's proposal for a face to 
> face at the next meeting. Which issues should we address 
> there so that we can work out how long a meeting we should have.
>         
>         Thanks
>         Brian   
>