RE: Action Item: Draft proposal for prevention of SCE-MI 1.1 and SCE-MI 2.0 model mixing

Per,

Yes I did. Thanks !

-- johnS

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-itc@eda.org on behalf of Per Bojsen
Sent: Tue 9/27/2005 1:03 PM
To: itc@eda.org
Subject: Re: Action Item: Draft proposal for prevention of SCE-MI 1.1 and      SCE-MI 2.0 model mixing
 
Hi John,

> 4. No SCE-MI 1.2 imported function calls can make calls
               ^^^

I'm sure you meant 2.0 here :-)

So I noticed you used the convention proposed by Russ to use 2.0
to refer to the features that are new in 2.0 and 1.1/1.x to refer
to the old features that are reatined in SCE-MI 2.0 for backwards
compatibility reasons, right?  It would be nice to have a figure
in the preamble to the standard (one of the introductory sections,
that is) that shows the relationship between 1.1 and 2.0 . . .

Per

-- 
Per Bojsen                                Email: <bojsen@zaiqtech.com>
Zaiq Technologies, Inc.                   WWW:   http://www.zaiqtech.com
78 Dragon Ct.                             Tel:   781 721 8229
Woburn, MA 01801                          Fax:   781 932 7488