Hi John, > I meant to answer this last week. Yes this latest version > of your code worked fine. Good! > Also, just to re-cap on your idea at least week's meeting > of revising the blocking calls to be able to deal with > any buffer size even if it exceeds the currently > supported internal buffer size of the non-blocking API, > it might make sense to have the following call: > > int dpi_pipe_c_get_depth( > void *pipe_handle, // input: pipe handle > svBit input_or_output ); // input: 1 for input pipe, 0 for output > pipe Yes, I was thinking the same thing. Besides making it easier to implement the `smart' blocking calls, having this call also makes the interface more symmetric. Per -- Per Bojsen Email: <bojsen@zaiqtech.com> Zaiq Technologies, Inc. WWW: http://www.zaiqtech.com 78 Dragon Ct. Tel: 781 721 8229 Woburn, MA 01801 Fax: 781 932 7488Received on Mon Mar 20 12:39:19 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 20 2006 - 12:39:21 PST