Re: Some review feedback on the DPI chapter

Hi Shabtay,

> [Shabtay] Actually the 060907 version is the one I sent. Note the String
> is not mentioned in Table 2. The data types in Table 1 are presented
> just for reference in the informative section.
> 
> Where do you see string being proposed in this document for SCEMI 2? 

What I saw was a remnant of the deleted section that looked like you
were still proposing to support strings.

> [Shabtay] If we stay within your proposed C boundaries we need to stay
> within the SV DPI spec which is too restrictive. But if we extend it, we
> need to be specific on the language/ threading package and whether it is
> part of the simulation kernel. Based on my understanding the use model
> cannot be universally extended to any threading package/language that
> integrates with C.

This needs more thought as I am not sure we understand all the implications
of what you are saying.

Per